Necromunda's back! Sort of.
GW has released Shadow War: Armageddon (SWA), and I picked up the electronic rulebook to see what all the fuss is about. This is written from the perspective of someone who is familiar with the old rules- back in the day, I ran Delaque and Ratskin gangs. I've got a soft spot for Necromunda, despite its flaws. I sold it all many years ago, but had the foresight to keep a few pictures which will illustrate my commentary.
SWA brings warband skirmishes back to the 40K universe. Instead of Necromunda's underhive gangs, you can now use a basic squad of troopers. The rules concentrate on Space Marine Scouts, Orks, and Imperial Guard, but every 40K faction has rules for figures, wargear and special characters. You'll have between 3-20 figures per side. There are no vehicles, and power armour is the exception rather than the rule.
The rulebook itself is 200 pages (about 20 pages of rules, most of the rest is wargear and army lists), and is available in paperback or electronic format. It is full colour, with pretty photos, and some summary chart pages at the back.
These are lifted with minimal changes from the original Necromunda. It's an IGOUGO system where your side moves, shoots, then melees, then your opponent does the same. Combat is roll to hit, to wound, then save. Close combat is a roll-off, where the difference between rolls is the number of hits- wound and save as per shooting.
Any shooting hits which don't wound you will pin you, denying you actions in your turn. Most wounded players will be 'downed', and nearby friendlies will have to test to make sure they don't run.
When your gang has taken 25% casualties you have to test your leader at the start of each turn to see if your gang stays in the fight.
Missions and campaigns
The missions are also straight from the original- meeting engagements, raids, scavenging missions, ambushes. You'll have to come up with justification for why your Dark Eldar are fighting Tyranids for scrap metal in in Imperial underhive, but the far future is not a place for introspection.
The campaign system is the biggest rules change from the original, and has been streamlined. In each mission, you gain 1-3 Promethium Caches depending on how well you do. When your squad has accumulated 15 Caches, you win overall. You can spend Caches to have, say, a Terminator accompany your Space Marine Scouts for a mission, but obviously this eats into your Caches, and if the Terminator goes down then your opponent gets a bonus. I like how Victory Points are expendable assets like this.
The experience and replenishing has been simplified. At the end of each mission, one chosen squad member gains a random skill or stat boost. You don't need to keep track of how many fighters he has taken out himself. Similarly, you get 100 credits to either put toward a new fighter or new fixed-price equipment. Unlike the original, you're not scrounging for cash and rare equipment, and there's no building up of your territory.
Another interesting use of your Promethium is to bolster your cash. If a figure costs over 100 credits to recruit, you can cash out a Cache to put towards the cost. This makes losing those cool figures all the more painful, as you have to expend your VPs to replace them.
Areas for improvement
In ripping an entire set of rules from over 20y ago, GW has also inherited some dated mechanisms. The most glaring is the IGOUGO system. It would have been fantastic to see some type of alternating activation, or randomised, or affected by a figure's initiative and leadership. This is the biggest missed opportunity in these rules.
Another area I would have liked to see more thought put in is the campaign system. All the factions are doing the same missions for the same rewards. It would have been nice to see some faction-specific goals, such as to gain new followers for cultists, or retrieve a number of artefacts for other xenos factions.
An area which could cause grief is the absence of any handicapping. There is no balancing mechanism between a starting squad and a veteran one which only needs to win one more Promethium Cache to 'win' the campaign. In contrast, Blood Bowl has an excellently honed inducement system to give the underdogs a leg-up.
Shadow War is an easy entry to the 40K galaxy. Any plastic squad will suffice, and give a fun game between like-minded opponents. It should be easy to find opponents.
This is not going to give you a perfectly balanced, competitive game. Neither is it going to spell out the tale of how your squad helps win the larger war- you'll have to justify a narrative to suit.
Shadow War is functional, but a missed opportunity to add some interesting activation mechanisms to an old ruleset.
A very fair and balanced review. I've been playing a few games and I do enjoy the throwback gaming - but you're right, the IGOUGO does feel very dated. I really like the harsh mechanism of testing once 25% of your force is down as it can mean you always have a chance to snatch victory by killing a couple of opposing models. Perhaps that could be seen as not "fair", but it is fun and keeps you on your toes!ReplyDelete
I think it will be fun against a like-minded opponent interested in a narrative campaign.Delete
I really appreciate this analysis of the new rules. I totally agree that the IGOUGO system is now outdated and there are lots and lots of excellent alternatives developed in other skirmish games (Deadman's Hand, Frostgrave, Imperial Assault, Bolt Action -- the list just goes on).ReplyDelete
Beautiful minis by the way - I love that can of Coke!
Thanks, Matt, they're about 20 years old now!Delete
I don't think it would be too hard to use a different activation mechanism for this, keep everything else the same.
But it would have been a great opportunity for GW to explore a new mechanic and give each faction a way to tweak it to their advantage.
The way you've painted those genestealer cultists looks like the spitting image of the art. That's some amazing work!ReplyDelete
Thank you, Mr Pink, I'm very happy with how they came out!Delete
Nice review. I recently picked up a copy of the rules and have been slowly reading through them.ReplyDelete
I look forward to trying them out and may try some different activation mechanics if my group isn't opposed to it.
I think that would be great, let us know how you go.Delete
In 2010 I tried to rewrite GorkaMorka to suit what I thought that It should be like, to try to eliminate the flaws as I saw them.ReplyDelete
I spent a bit of time on it, but in the end decided that in fact it wasnt worth it, and played a campaign using the rules as written.
The campaign system still bugged me though. It required far too much bookwork and was much to fiddly for my tastes.
I feel similarly about the core SWA rules (seeing as they are close to identical to GoMo) but the tidied up campaign system is a big improvement.
An underdog bonus would be good, and certain forces have limited options and equipment to add after only a game or two but considering that the longest SWA campaign that I am likely to get played these days is a weekend long binge, Im not to bothered.
Check out the small print re Parrying too. As a Necromunda Veteran Im sure that you will be pleased to see how it has been brought under control.
I hope that you get some fun out of SWA! I have been enjoying it.
Oh yeah, head swaps on the Neophyte hybrid kit work really well for quickly making a certain sort of armed Imperial civilian, if you are inclined.
If you are into sci-fi civilians then I strongly suggest that you take a look at the "Astropolis" and "Colony 87" ranges for some gorgeous, unarmed miniatures that slot right into gaming in the 41st millennium.
Thanks, Cheetor! I'll check out those SF ranges. Unfortunately I'm a little short on appropriate scenery currently- add it to the to-do list...ReplyDelete